< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index Next in Thread >

Re: [reSIProcate] PRACK UAS support


I will try to get some time to review the patch over the next few weeks.  It would be very helpful if you could preform the testing before the patch get's merged into SVN though.
 
Thanks,
Scott

On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Barta Martin <barta.martin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks a lot Björn,

  You saved the day :-)
  I'll start from there and focus on testing the feature.

  Scott, do you think the patch is in a condition to be accepted in
  the main?

  Thanks again,

  Martin


Bjorn Andersson (bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> We have been working on UAS prack for some time and it appears to work
> reasonable, but more testing is needed.
> The guy doing the job, Markus Eriksson, has taken a job in an other
> company so the progress has been slow lately ;-)
>
> Best Regards
> Björn Andersson
>
> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:04 +0200, Martin Barta wrote:
> > Thanks Scott,
> >
> > I'll see what I can do.
> > I'm finishing something else right now and hopefully I'll get to this
> > in a month or two.
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Scott Godin <sgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >         Hi Martin,
> >
> >         That's excellent.  I'm not aware of anyone in the community
> >         currently
> >         working on adding UAS Prack support.  From what I understand,
> >         Jason
> >         and some other's worked out a state machine for both UAC and
> >         UAS
> >         invites session states that included PRACK handling - these
> >         can be
> >         found in the dum/docs directory.  The UAC PRACK handling side
> >         of
> >         these states were implemented, but the UAS side remains as a
> >         TODO
> >         item.  I think the changes would be isolated to the state
> >         machine
> >         implemented in the dum/ServerInviteSession class - some
> >         changes to the
> >         base class InviteSession may also be required.
> >
> >         If you want to take a crack at this, and post some diff's to
> >         the list
> >         - that would be fantastic.
> >
> >         Thanks,
> >         Scott
> >
> >
> >         On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Martin Barta
> >         <barta.martin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >         > Hi all,
> >         >
> >         > Any news about the feature or a plan to implement it in the
> >         near future?
> >         >
> >         > I could help with PRACK UAS implementation if someone would
> >         summarize what
> >         > is missing and give me some hints.
> >         > If I understand it right (from Jason's reply to this mailing
> >         list some time
> >         > ago), most of the coding has already been done.
> >         >
> >         > Yes, some open issues should be taken into consideration,
> >         like "rejecting
> >         > PRACK offer" -
> >         >
> >         http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-10#section-6,
> >         > etc.
> >         > But with some help from the community I should be able to
> >         finish the
> >         > implementation.
> >         >
> >         > Thanks,
> >         >
> >         > Martin
> >         >
> >
> >         > _______________________________________________
> >         > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> >         > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >         >
> >         https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> >         >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel