Re: [reSIProcate] PRACK UAS support

[Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Martin,
We have been working on UAS prack for some time and it appears to work
reasonable, but more testing is needed.
The guy doing the job, Markus Eriksson, has taken a job in an other
company so the progress has been slow lately ;-)

Best Regards
Björn Andersson

On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:04 +0200, Martin Barta wrote:
> Thanks Scott,
> 
> I'll see what I can do. 
> I'm finishing something else right now and hopefully I'll get to this
> in a month or two.
> 
> Martin
> 
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Scott Godin <sgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>         Hi Martin,
>         
>         That's excellent.  I'm not aware of anyone in the community
>         currently
>         working on adding UAS Prack support.  From what I understand,
>         Jason
>         and some other's worked out a state machine for both UAC and
>         UAS
>         invites session states that included PRACK handling - these
>         can be
>         found in the dum/docs directory.  The UAC PRACK handling side
>         of
>         these states were implemented, but the UAS side remains as a
>         TODO
>         item.  I think the changes would be isolated to the state
>         machine
>         implemented in the dum/ServerInviteSession class - some
>         changes to the
>         base class InviteSession may also be required.
>         
>         If you want to take a crack at this, and post some diff's to
>         the list
>         - that would be fantastic.
>         
>         Thanks,
>         Scott
>         
>         
>         On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Martin Barta
>         <barta.martin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>         > Hi all,
>         >
>         > Any news about the feature or a plan to implement it in the
>         near future?
>         >
>         > I could help with PRACK UAS implementation if someone would
>         summarize what
>         > is missing and give me some hints.
>         > If I understand it right (from Jason's reply to this mailing
>         list some time
>         > ago), most of the coding has already been done.
>         >
>         > Yes, some open issues should be taken into consideration,
>         like "rejecting
>         > PRACK offer" -
>         >
>         
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-10#section-6,
>         > etc.
>         > But with some help from the community I should be able to
>         finish the
>         > implementation.
>         >
>         > Thanks,
>         >
>         > Martin
>         >
>         
>         > _______________________________________________
>         > resiprocate-devel mailing list
>         > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>         >
>         https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>         >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel

Attachment: prack_patch_on_1.5.diff.tgz
Description: application/compressed-tar