Re: [reSIProcate] PRACK UAS support
Thanks a lot Björn,
You saved the day :-)
I'll start from there and focus on testing the feature.
Scott, do you think the patch is in a condition to be accepted in
the main?
Thanks again,
Martin
Bjorn Andersson (bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> We have been working on UAS prack for some time and it appears to work
> reasonable, but more testing is needed.
> The guy doing the job, Markus Eriksson, has taken a job in an other
> company so the progress has been slow lately ;-)
>
> Best Regards
> Björn Andersson
>
> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:04 +0200, Martin Barta wrote:
> > Thanks Scott,
> >
> > I'll see what I can do.
> > I'm finishing something else right now and hopefully I'll get to this
> > in a month or two.
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Scott Godin <sgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > That's excellent. I'm not aware of anyone in the community
> > currently
> > working on adding UAS Prack support. From what I understand,
> > Jason
> > and some other's worked out a state machine for both UAC and
> > UAS
> > invites session states that included PRACK handling - these
> > can be
> > found in the dum/docs directory. The UAC PRACK handling side
> > of
> > these states were implemented, but the UAS side remains as a
> > TODO
> > item. I think the changes would be isolated to the state
> > machine
> > implemented in the dum/ServerInviteSession class - some
> > changes to the
> > base class InviteSession may also be required.
> >
> > If you want to take a crack at this, and post some diff's to
> > the list
> > - that would be fantastic.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Scott
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Martin Barta
> > <barta.martin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Any news about the feature or a plan to implement it in the
> > near future?
> > >
> > > I could help with PRACK UAS implementation if someone would
> > summarize what
> > > is missing and give me some hints.
> > > If I understand it right (from Jason's reply to this mailing
> > list some time
> > > ago), most of the coding has already been done.
> > >
> > > Yes, some open issues should be taken into consideration,
> > like "rejecting
> > > PRACK offer" -
> > >
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-10#section-6,
> > > etc.
> > > But with some help from the community I should be able to
> > finish the
> > > implementation.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel