< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index Next in Thread >

Re: [reSIProcate] PRACK UAS support


Thanks a lot Björn,

   You saved the day :-)
   I'll start from there and focus on testing the feature. 

   Scott, do you think the patch is in a condition to be accepted in
   the main?

   Thanks again,

   Martin


Bjorn Andersson (bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> We have been working on UAS prack for some time and it appears to work
> reasonable, but more testing is needed.
> The guy doing the job, Markus Eriksson, has taken a job in an other
> company so the progress has been slow lately ;-)
> 
> Best Regards
> Björn Andersson
> 
> On Thu, 2009-10-08 at 09:04 +0200, Martin Barta wrote:
> > Thanks Scott,
> > 
> > I'll see what I can do. 
> > I'm finishing something else right now and hopefully I'll get to this
> > in a month or two.
> > 
> > Martin
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Scott Godin <sgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >         Hi Martin,
> >         
> >         That's excellent.  I'm not aware of anyone in the community
> >         currently
> >         working on adding UAS Prack support.  From what I understand,
> >         Jason
> >         and some other's worked out a state machine for both UAC and
> >         UAS
> >         invites session states that included PRACK handling - these
> >         can be
> >         found in the dum/docs directory.  The UAC PRACK handling side
> >         of
> >         these states were implemented, but the UAS side remains as a
> >         TODO
> >         item.  I think the changes would be isolated to the state
> >         machine
> >         implemented in the dum/ServerInviteSession class - some
> >         changes to the
> >         base class InviteSession may also be required.
> >         
> >         If you want to take a crack at this, and post some diff's to
> >         the list
> >         - that would be fantastic.
> >         
> >         Thanks,
> >         Scott
> >         
> >         
> >         On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Martin Barta
> >         <barta.martin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >         > Hi all,
> >         >
> >         > Any news about the feature or a plan to implement it in the
> >         near future?
> >         >
> >         > I could help with PRACK UAS implementation if someone would
> >         summarize what
> >         > is missing and give me some hints.
> >         > If I understand it right (from Jason's reply to this mailing
> >         list some time
> >         > ago), most of the coding has already been done.
> >         >
> >         > Yes, some open issues should be taken into consideration,
> >         like "rejecting
> >         > PRACK offer" -
> >         >
> >         
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer-10#section-6,
> >         > etc.
> >         > But with some help from the community I should be able to
> >         finish the
> >         > implementation.
> >         >
> >         > Thanks,
> >         >
> >         > Martin
> >         >
> >         
> >         > _______________________________________________
> >         > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> >         > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >         >
> >         https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> >         >
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > resiprocate-devel mailing list
> > resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel