[reSIProcate] Suggestion regarding c-ares and e-poll interface

[Scott Godin]

This looks like some good stuff!  Thanks for contributing.  I'm a bit
pegged at the moment, but I would like to review this in more detail when I
get some cycles.

How confident are you that the Windows FdPoll stuff was not broken?

Thanks again!
Scott

On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Misha Uliutin <mishaulyutin at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
> I’ve created a Pull request[1] in which I moved c-ares wrapper (AresDNS)
> to e-poll based interface.
> Also I’ve deleted a inefficient hack code from FdPoll.cxx, which was
> added for supporting c-ares wrapper based on FdSetIOObserver.
>
> Can someone review it and get to the point where it can be merged?
>
>
> [1] = https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/pull/51
>
> BR,
> Misha U.
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20160822/a50a34ee/attachment.htm>