[reSIProcate] Suggestion regarding c-ares and e-poll interface

[Misha Uliutin]

Thank you,
libc-ares has pretty similar interface to lib-ares, so my implementation pretty similar to current FdSetIOObserver implementation for lib-ares + I've played with compile flags and built resiprocate with select implemetion in linux for tests and it works.

BR,
Misha U.

> On 22 Aug 2016, at 15:59, Scott Godin <sgodin at sipspectrum.com> wrote:
> 
> This looks like some good stuff!  Thanks for contributing.  I'm a bit pegged at the moment, but I would like to review this in more detail when I get some cycles.  
> 
> How confident are you that the Windows FdPoll stuff was not broken?  
> 
> Thanks again!
> Scott
> 
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Misha Uliutin <mishaulyutin at gmail.com <mailto:mishaulyutin at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hello,
> I’ve created a Pull request[1] in which I moved c-ares wrapper (AresDNS) to e-poll based interface.
> Also I’ve deleted a inefficient hack code from FdPoll.cxx, which was added for supporting c-ares wrapper based on FdSetIOObserver.
> 
> Can someone review it and get to the point where it can be merged?
>  
> 
> [1] = https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/pull/51 <https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/pull/51>
> 
> BR,
> Misha U.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org <mailto:resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org>
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel <https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20160823/a577de47/attachment.htm>