[reSIProcate] dumping autotools and moving to CMake?

[Byron Campen]

Yes, any change like this would be an inconvenience to some. I hope that we
could get an idea of how many would have a difficult time with a change
like this, so if anyone falls into this category, please speak up. We are
very much in a phase where we need this input.

Best regards,
Byron Campen
On Jan 4, 2014 5:47 PM, "Joegen Baclor" <jbaclor at ezuce.com> wrote:

> On 01/05/2014 12:24 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>>
>> On 04/01/14 17:18, Byron Campen wrote:
>>
>>>       While I do like cmake, it is not a panacea, and there are some
>>> sharp
>>> edges. I think it might be illustrative to try writing a cmake build for
>>> rutil/stack (plus tests), and see how much pain we run into. I can give
>>> this a go, since I have some experience with it.
>>>
>>>
>> Any feedback about it would be great, feel free to add to the wiki as well
>>
>> In terms of priorities, I think that any cmake effort can probably wait
>> until after the 1.9.0 release has been tagged though.  Most of my own
>> tweaks are now committed and will appear in a beta9 tarball very soon
>> and it would be useful to have any final concerns/problems listed if
>> anybody thinks it is not suitable for release.
>>
>>
>>  It is worth mentioning that some projects (like mine) has integrated
> resiprocate as a native submodule utilizing the capability of autotools to
> nest other project within a single homogeneous build. This is not a
> complaint but just a side note.  Whatever works best for resiprocate, I
> won't have trouble with.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20140104/0f351ddb/attachment.htm>