[reSIProcate] dumping autotools and moving to CMake?
Joegen Baclor
jbaclor at ezuce.com
Sat Jan 4 19:47:35 CST 2014
On 01/05/2014 12:24 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> On 04/01/14 17:18, Byron Campen wrote:
>> While I do like cmake, it is not a panacea, and there are some sharp
>> edges. I think it might be illustrative to try writing a cmake build for
>> rutil/stack (plus tests), and see how much pain we run into. I can give
>> this a go, since I have some experience with it.
>>
>
> Any feedback about it would be great, feel free to add to the wiki as well
>
> In terms of priorities, I think that any cmake effort can probably wait
> until after the 1.9.0 release has been tagged though. Most of my own
> tweaks are now committed and will appear in a beta9 tarball very soon
> and it would be useful to have any final concerns/problems listed if
> anybody thinks it is not suitable for release.
>
>
It is worth mentioning that some projects (like mine) has integrated
resiprocate as a native submodule utilizing the capability of autotools
to nest other project within a single homogeneous build. This is not a
complaint but just a side note. Whatever works best for resiprocate, I
won't have trouble with.
More information about the resiprocate-devel
mailing list