[reSIProcate] Re: [repro-users] Registrations with to tag are rejected

[Rohan Mahy]

On Jul 5, 2005, at 7:49, Scott Godin wrote:

> I haven't yet - but I will.  Are there any problems caused by the to 
> tag
> being present?  If not - I would suggest that we be less stringent - in
> order to be able to support more (buggy) end devices.  :)

I think we want to be able to detect broken implementations at this 
early stage so we can try to get them fixed.  Later down the road I 
agree its good to make the product silently fix up broken but 
non-harmful problems.

My 2 cents.

thanks,
-rohan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rohan Mahy [mailto:rohan at ekabal.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2005 10:30 AM
> To: Scott Godin
> Cc: repro-users at list.sipfoundry.org; Rohan Mahy;
> resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: Re: [repro-users] Registrations with to tag are rejected
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> Rather than silently reinforce the broken behavior, have you at least
> brought this bug to their attention?  They may be willing to fix their
> registrations.
>
> thanks,
> -rohan
>
> On Jul 4, 2005, at 7:33, Scott Godin wrote:
>
>> I noticed that registrations containing a to tag are discarded by
>> DialogUsageManager processRequest:
>>
>> makeResponse(failure, request, 400, "Registration requests can't have
>> To:
>> tags.");
>>
>> I know this is to spec, but I have some IPDialog devices that are
>> sending
>> registration refreshes and unregister requests with a to tag.  Do you
>> think
>> it would be harmful to just accept these requests, despite the fact
>> that
>> they are incorrect?
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> repro-users mailing list
>> repro-users at list.sipfoundry.org
>> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/repro-users