< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index Next in Thread >

Re: [reSIProcate] [resiprocate] New headers and parameters from RFC 3455 and UUI drafts (#6)


Hi Daniel,
Excluding DayOfWeekHash and MonthHash from build I was able to compile without 
changing DateCategory.cxx.
DayOfWeekHash and MonthHash are built because tool configured in project is 
"C/C++ Compiler Tool" instead of "Custom Build Tool" as per other header files.

Regards,
Dario.

-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Pocock [mailto:daniel@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: martedì 23 settembre 2014 18.24
To: Dario Bozzali
Cc: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [resiprocate] New headers and parameters from RFC 3455 and UUI 
drafts (#6)


Hi Dario,

I notice that MethodHash is including string.h and ctype.h so I've added those 
same includes to DateCategory.cxx so they will be included before DayOfWeekHash 
and MonthHash

Can you just confirm, Visual Studio is not trying to compile these cxx files 
into separate objects?  It should only be including them when it compiles 
DateCategory.cxx so they should all become part of the object file 
DateCategory.o

Regards,

Daniel

On 23/09/14 18:08, Dario Bozzali wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> Below I reported the output obtained using Visual Studio 2005 to build master.
> Dario.
> 
> 1>DayOfWeekHash.cxx
> 1>dayofweek.gperf(5) : error C2146: syntax error : missing ';' before 
> identifier 'type'
> 1>dayofweek.gperf(5) : error C4430: missing type specifier - int 
> 1>assumed. Note: C++ does not support default-int
> 1>dayofweek.gperf(5) : error C4430: missing type specifier - int 
> 1>assumed. Note: C++ does not support default-int
> 1>dayofweek.gperf(13) : error C2065: 'Sat' : undeclared identifier
> 1>dayofweek.gperf(13) : error C2078: too many initializers
> 1>dayofweek.gperf(8) : error C2065: 'Mon' : undeclared identifier
> 1>dayofweek.gperf(7) : error C2065: 'Sun' : undeclared identifier
> 1>dayofweek.gperf(10) : error C2065: 'Wed' : undeclared identifier
> 1>dayofweek.gperf(11) : error C2065: 'Thu' : undeclared identifier
> 1>dayofweek.gperf(12) : error C2065: 'Fri' : undeclared identifier
> 1>dayofweek.gperf(9) : error C2065: 'Tue' : undeclared identifier
> 1>dayofweek.gperf(20) : error C3861: 'strncmp': identifier not found 
> 1>MonthHash.cxx
> 1>month.gperf(5) : error C2146: syntax error : missing ';' before identifier 
> 'type'
> 1>month.gperf(5) : error C4430: missing type specifier - int assumed. 
> 1>Note: C++ does not support default-int
> 1>month.gperf(5) : error C4430: missing type specifier - int assumed. 
> 1>Note: C++ does not support default-int
> 1>month.gperf(12) : error C2065: 'Jun' : undeclared identifier
> 1>month.gperf(12) : error C2078: too many initializers
> 1>month.gperf(13) : error C2065: 'Jul' : undeclared identifier
> 1>month.gperf(7) : error C2065: 'Jan' : undeclared identifier
> 1>month.gperf(11) : error C2065: 'May' : undeclared identifier
> 1>month.gperf(8) : error C2065: 'Feb' : undeclared identifier
> 1>month.gperf(9) : error C2065: 'Mar' : undeclared identifier
> 1>month.gperf(10) : error C2065: 'Apr' : undeclared identifier
> 1>month.gperf(18) : error C2065: 'Dec' : undeclared identifier
> 1>month.gperf(14) : error C2065: 'Aug' : undeclared identifier
> 1>month.gperf(15) : error C2065: 'Sep' : undeclared identifier
> 1>month.gperf(16) : error C2065: 'Oct' : undeclared identifier
> 1>month.gperf(17) : error C2065: 'Nov' : undeclared identifier
> 1>month.gperf(28) : error C3861: 'strncmp': identifier not found
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Pocock [mailto:daniel@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: martedì 23 settembre 2014 17.48
> To: Dario Bozzali
> Cc: resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [resiprocate] New headers and parameters from RFC 3455 
> and UUI drafts (#6)
> 
> 
> 
> On 23/09/14 17:42, Dario Bozzali wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>> I solved the compiling issue changing Visual Studio project settings to 
>> exclude DayOfWeekHash.cxx and MonthHash.cxx from build. I commit this change 
>> for every VS version.
>> Now I will take a look at conflict issue.
> 
> 
> That sounds odd.  If you checkout the master branch, without any of your 
> changes, does it build with those files included?
> 
> If it doesn't build on master, can you tell me what error it gives?
>