[reSIProcate] Backport nomination?

[Max Bowsher <maxb@xxxxxxx>]

Some of the changes I've been committing would, I think, be reasonable
candidates for backport to 1.4.2, when/if it happens.

What is the resiprocate procedure for nominating a change for backport
consideration?

Are there any established policies on what sort of changes are and are
not acceptable?

Thanks,
Max.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature