< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index Next in Thread >

Re: [reSIProcate] Followup on c-ares support


Brad Spencer wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 05:33:08PM -0600, Adam Roach wrote:
During our testing, we did note that c-ares is substantially faster than the resip version of ares.

Interesting.  How much faster are we talking about?

I don't have the actual benchmarks at hand, but Byron and I discussed first-cut performance results. Doing some very DNS-heavy processing (i.e., each request was associated with a different DNS record, so no caching was possible), I think he said that we were able to push almost twice as many SIP transactions through repro with c-ares than with the built-in ares.

Normal disclaimers apply (we may have overlooked something, YMMV, etc).

/a