Re: [reSIProcate] Backport nomination?

[Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

	So, generally speaking, we backport bugfixes that address crashes and  
vulnerabilities as soon as we can. Other stuff we'll backport when  
we've got a fair number of bugfixes since the last point-release. I  
was planning on fixing a couple of outstanding issues, and then  
cutting a point-release in the near future. Most of your contributions  
are the sort of thing that could go into such a point-release.

Best regards,
Byron Campen

> Some of the changes I've been committing would, I think, be reasonable
> candidates for backport to 1.4.2, when/if it happens.
>
> What is the resiprocate procedure for nominating a change for backport
> consideration?
>
> Are there any established policies on what sort of changes are and are
> not acceptable?
>
> Thanks,
> Max.
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel