Re: [reSIProcate] removing hash<T*> from HashMap
For the record, on a cursory examination of the issue, I agree with
Alan. I'd also like Jason to weigh in on the original purpose of the
design before we go ripping things out, though.
/a
On 4/23/08 4:45 PM, Alan Hawrylyshen wrote:
On 23-Apr-08, at 13:43 , Byron Campen wrote:
Is anyone using this?
I cannot speak to this, but I've often wondered about the default
template implementation and after searching around and concluding that
nothing within resiprocate was using it, ignored it. The code falls
into the 'dangerous' category if you ask me since it is not only
surprising that something would compile, as Bruce points out, the
results are incorrect from time to time.
I am strongly in favor of removing it if there is no impact to the
stack and DUM / repro clients.
Thanks
A
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel