Re: [reSIProcate] removing hash<T*> from HashMap

["Jason Fischl" <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'm ok with removing this. I believe we used it long ago in some application code but it is something that could be done outside of rutil if needed.

Jason

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

For the record, on a cursory examination of the issue, I agree with
Alan. I'd also like Jason to weigh in on the original purpose of the
design before we go ripping things out, though.

/a

On 4/23/08 4:45 PM, Alan Hawrylyshen wrote:
> On 23-Apr-08, at 13:43 , Byron Campen wrote:
>
>
>>      Is anyone using this?
>>
>
>
> I cannot speak to this, but I've often wondered about the default
> template implementation and after searching around and concluding that
> nothing within resiprocate was using it, ignored it. The code falls
> into the 'dangerous' category if you ask me since it is not only
> surprising that something would compile, as Bruce points out, the
> results are incorrect from time to time.
>
> I am strongly in favor of removing it if there is no impact to the
> stack and DUM / repro clients.
>
> Thanks
> A
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>

_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel