Re: [reSIProcate] Packaging for Debian
Jason Fischl wrote:
On 2/27/07, Adam Roach <adam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Neil McGovern wrote:
> In summary: sipdial and the build system need a licence, or they're
not
> distributable. If the copyright of the others could also be checked,
> that'd be great :)
>
The build system has grown rather organically along with the rest of the
project. While my contributions to it hardly constitute a major part of
the system, they have been non-trivial, and my understanding at the time
was that the build system, like the code it accompanied, was intended to
be released under the Vovida license.
Jason: any comments?
yes. The build code is licensed under the Vovida License. We can add
the declarations into the files.
Okay. I'll tag them.
> contrib/db, contrib/getopt, contrib/pcre and contrib/popt don't
seem to
> be used at all, and can probably be removed.
>
contrib/popt is used in some of the unit tests isn't it?
Under any of the Unix-flavored builds, the system-installed version of
popt is used. If you look under contrib/popt, you'll notice that it
contains precisely one subdirectory, called "win32".
I thought contrib/pcre was used in repro but not sure
It isn't. Under the Unix build system, repro uses normal posix regexes;
cf. RouteStore.hxx:
#ifdef WIN32
#include <pcreposix.h>
#else
#include <regex.h>
#endif
Even if this moves to pcre in the future, the *correct* thing to do
would be to use the system-installed pcre, like we do with popt.
/a