Re: [reSIProcate] Packaging for Debian
Probably the right thing to do.
MIT's ares is still at 1.1.1 (circa 2001) - there doesn't seem to be
anyone there to take changes back anyhow.
There is at least one other fork that's done different things.
So, lets plan to change the name of this library to resip-ares and
update our wiki/etc. to reflect it.
This would show in head as quickly as we make the change. It would
show up in the 1.2 release.
RjS
On Feb 27, 2007, at 3:33 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Robert Sparks wrote:
Thank you Neil!
One quick comment on 2) below.
We have effectively forked ares - resiprocate won't (I think) build
against ares straight from MIT.
Should the fork be given a different name, so that it too can be
packaged and installed concurrently with the regular ares libraries
and
headers?
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel