< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index  

Re: [reSIProcate] New resip release


The anonymous download is 103M. A gzipped tarball of that weighs in at 17M.

The anonymous export is 35M (1/3, not 1/2). A gzipped tarball of that is 8M.

We could provide both as easily as we provide either one.

The big thing we're building consensus on here (and I think we're agreeing with each other) is that act of making the distribution will involve running a simple command that's already implemented rather than doing a lot of work to create and test a non-trivial make dist target.

RjS

ps - there's some scrubbing we can do to make those absolute numbers smaller too,
but on first inspection, we're talking about maybe a 5% reduction.

On Aug 4, 2006, at 12:18 PM, Byron Campen wrote:

Would the tarball be twice as big? Is gzip smart enough to detect that Foo.cxx and .svn/text-base/Foo.cxx are the same thing?

Best regards,
Byron Campen

Except that an svn checkout is twice the size of an svn export.

Still want to do that?

A

-----Original Message-----
From: "Jason Fischl" <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 07:58:12
To:"Robert Sparks" <rjsparks@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:"Alan Hawrylyshen" <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, resiprocate-devel <resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] New resip release

On 8/4/06, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The next tarball won't bother - it will expose the same build system
you get when you check out from head (along with the ./configure adam
contributed).

I suspect we'll find the distribution will be a simple tarball of an
anonymous checkout. (The person checking it out could run svn update on the
unrolled bits).


This sounds perfect to me.
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel