Re: [reSIProcate] New resip release
On 8/3/06, Alan Hawrylyshen <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2006.08.01, at 14:11 , Jason Fischl wrote:
> My recommendation is that this time around, that we just provide a
> release number and/or tag associated with the release candidate rather
> than providing a tarball. Once we are ready to do the actual release,
> we can generate the tarball. I think this will lower the bar on
> getting new releases out.
>
> Jason
>
Agreed, however there is some concern around what goes INTO the
tarball, and there will be non-zero time needed to debug the tarball
itself.
I found that our decision to strip lots of stuff out of the tarball
last time was a mistake. I think we should leave most stuff in and
reduce the effort to produce the tarball instead. My guess is that
more frequent releases would be preferred.