Re: [reSIProcate] New resip release

[Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

	Would the tarball be twice as big? Is gzip smart enough to detect  
that Foo.cxx and .svn/text-base/Foo.cxx are the same thing?

Best regards,
Byron Campen

> Except that an svn checkout is twice the size of an svn export.
>
> Still want to do that?
>
> A
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Jason Fischl" <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 07:58:12
> To:"Robert Sparks" <rjsparks@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc:"Alan Hawrylyshen" <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,       resiprocate-devel  
> <resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] New resip release
>
> On 8/4/06, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The next tarball won't bother - it will expose the same build system
> > you get when you check out from head (along with the ./configure adam
> > contributed).
> >
> > I suspect we'll find the distribution will be a simple tarball of an
> > anonymous checkout. (The person checking it out could run svn  
> > update on the
> > unrolled bits).
>
> This sounds perfect to me.
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature