[reSIProcate] c-ares Coverity improvements

[Scott Godin]

Both c-ares and resip-ares were branched from the original ares project.
I'm not sure how similar they are at this point, but my guess is that any
kind of merge would be a nightmare.  It might be better easier to run
Coverity on resip-ares and make the fixes independently - not sure.

Scott

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Daniel Pocock <daniel at pocock.pro> wrote:

>
> The c-ares community have been doing some Coverity scans and fixing some
> potential security and stability issues in the code, it is discussed on
> their mailing list:
>
> http://c-ares.haxx.se/mail/c-ares-archive-2014-09/
>
> It may be useful to update or merge into the reSIProcate copy of the
> c-ares code to benefit from that work
>
> https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/tree/master/rutil/dns/ares
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20140930/af790c4e/attachment.htm>