[reSIProcate] asio version? separate reTurn source tarball?

[Scott Godin]

Just tried 1.10.1 - it only needed a few fixes to compile.  Checked into
SVN.   The changes are backwards compatible with 1.4.8.

Scott


On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 1:40 AM, Daniel Pocock <daniel at pocock.com.au> wrote:

>
>
> On 11/02/14 23:53, Scott Godin wrote:
> > Any idea if reTurn builds on asio 1.10 already?
> >
> > Seems like the easiest way to go is to ensure that it will.
> >
>
>
> It currently fails
>
> The 1.10.1 package was on Debian when I uploaded the reSIProcate
> release, Debian now has 1.4.8 again while we investigate
>
> The two main things we need to check:
>
> a) does it involve a big effort to change things or just some renamed
> methods?
>
> b) can we concurrently support the old version?  This is important
> because 1.4.8 is in EPEL6 (for RHEL6 / CentOS6 users)
>
>
> > Scott
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Daniel Pocock <daniel at pocock.com.au>
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> reTurn currently builds against asio 1.4.x
> >>
> >> Debian 7, Fedora and EPEL6 carry 1.4.x
> >>
> >> Debian 8 (jessie) may carry asio 1.10.x
> >>
> >> Fedora 21 has not made any decision
> >>
> >> Keeping dependencies like this in sync can be a pain
> >>
> >> Is there any motivation to use 1.10.x in the next reSIProcate release?
> >>
> >> Should we possibly start releasing reTurn as a separate source tarball
> >> so that this dependency issue doesn't impact the process of releasing
> >> the core reSIProcate/repro packages?
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> >> resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org
> >> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> >>
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20140213/4793fb71/attachment.htm>