[reSIProcate] releasing 1.9.0? changelog?

[Scott Godin]

Doesn't really matter to me - in the past we have created the changelog in
SVN first - using Wiki formatting - ie: * for bullet points, etc.

Then just pasted this into the wiki when it's complete.  That has sometimes
got the wiki out of date - when SVN is updated, but the wiki is forgotten.
 Perhaps we should just link to the changelog file in SVN from the wiki.

Scott


On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Daniel Pocock <daniel at pocock.com.au> wrote:

>  On 05/02/14 15:38, Scott Godin wrote:
>
>  My 2 cents on the change log.  Many people currently using the stack may
> have no interest in the new features however would consider upgrading for
> bug fixes.  Having to dig through 100's of commit logs is pretty
> cumbersome.  Many commits are fixes for new features and not existing
> (previous release) features and it is difficult for others to determine
> which ones are which.
>  I'm willing to help generate the change log if others feel it is
> worthwhile as well.
>
>
> I'm not averse to including something like that and it will definitely be
> easier if we can share this effort
>
> Would you prefer that this starts on the wiki or in SVN?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20140205/7c8230e1/attachment.htm>