[reSIProcate] RADIUS for reSIProcate/dum

Adam Roach adam at nostrum.com
Fri May 9 16:22:21 CDT 2008


On 5/9/08 4:11 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> For the moment, I will implement it with the existing method - but be 
> warned, my complete B2BUA solution adds even more dependencies, 
> including Java.  I might release it separately so as not to 
> over-complicate reSIProcate and this mailing list - any comments?

Your best bet is to check it into the repository in a separate branch, 
just like the recon work. If it's something radical (and it sounds like 
it may be), you probably want to ask people to review the changes prior 
to merging them into main.

>
> There is a saying that for every extra question you ask the end user 
> during compile/install, half your users will be turned away...
>

By default, you can type 'make' and be asked no questions. Only a manual 
run of configure causes any questions to be asked.

Anyway, like I said, I can sympathize with the sentiment that the 
configure questionnaire is becoming a bit cumbersome. So, just a couple 
of minutes ago, I checked in changes that add an *experimental* mode of 
operation to the configure script that is more interactive and 
(hopefully) a little more intuitive. You can activate this new mode with 
the '-m' flag:

  ./configure -m

Give it a spin and let me know what you think.

/a



More information about the resiprocate-devel mailing list