[reSIProcate] removing hash<T*> from HashMap

[Adam Roach]

For the record, on a cursory examination of the issue, I agree with 
Alan. I'd also like Jason to weigh in on the original purpose of the 
design before we go ripping things out, though.

/a

On 4/23/08 4:45 PM, Alan Hawrylyshen wrote:
> On 23-Apr-08, at 13:43 , Byron Campen wrote:
>
>   
>> 	Is anyone using this?
>>     
>
>
> I cannot speak to this, but I've often wondered about the default  
> template implementation and after searching around and concluding that  
> nothing within resiprocate was using it, ignored it. The code falls  
> into the 'dangerous' category if you ask me since it is not only  
> surprising that something would compile, as Bruce points out, the  
> results are incorrect from time to time.
>
> I am strongly in favor of removing it if there is no impact to the  
> stack and DUM / repro clients.
>
> Thanks
> A
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>