[reSIProcate] Maybe there have a bug with 1.3 RC1

[Byron Campen]

	Hmm. That thread isn't actually shut-down. ThreadIf::shutdown() just  
sets a sentinel value that will only take effect the next time the  
StackThread finishes cycling. The waitForShutdown() call used to  
function simply as a sleep() call; the fact that it took a while to  
return was the only thing allowing the cycle to complete before  
everything went out of scope. mShutdown is set, but mShutdown is just  
the sentinel value, and there is no guarantee whatsoever that it is  
being honored. I'll think about this more in the morning.

Best regards,
Byron Campen


> I'm using Visual C++ 8.0(Visual Studio 2005 with SP1 and SP1 for  
> Vista Update), My OS is Vista+SP1.
> complied My applications and reSIProcate with MT and MTd mode,  
> others are using default settings.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> 2008/3/30, Alan Hawrylyshen <alan at polyphase.ca>:
>
> On 29-Mar-08, at 20:05 , Karlsson wrote:
>
> > Hi Alan, I'm sure, I use SVN to got all 1.3.0 source code to a new
> > directory: reSIProcate13. The older reSIProcate in another
> > directory: resiprocate122.
> > I have complied the 1.3.0 RC1 completely, and My application linked
> > these new header files and LIBs, I complied all reSIProcate module
> > as MTd and MT .
> > ...
>
> I apologize if you have indicated this previously, but what platform
> are you using, along with specific compiler and runtime library
> details? (Windows, Linux, BSD, Mac OS) and what compiler, variant of
> OS, etc...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at resiprocate.org
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20080329/8ad3b449/attachment.htm>