[reSIProcate] Can sip ACK be used for Register response

[Yuan, Frank]

Ramsundar,

 

Yes, I noticed it.

 

The Call Id.  from-tag are the same, and the time stamps are right.
Besides there is no INVITE from this sip phone.  So I wonder if SIP ACK
could be used for Register response since LINKSYS SIPURA phone is very
popular and could not make this kind of silly mistake.

 

 

Yes, I noticed it.

The Call Id.  from-tag are the same, and the time stamps are right.
Besides there is no INVITE from this sip phone.  So I wonder if SIP ACK
could be used for Register response since LINKSYS SIPURA phone is very
popular and could not make this kind of silly mistake.

 

 

 

Regards,

 

Frank Y 

 

 

________________________________

From: Ramsundar [mailto:kramasundar at yahoo.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 2:30 PM
To: Yuan, Frank
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] Can sip ACK be used for Register response

 

Hi Frank,

CSeq (in the ACK) seems to be different than that of the REGISTER
msg.... check that...

Ramsundar

"Yuan, Frank" <Frank.Yuan at stratus.com> wrote:

Hi All,

 

As far as I know that SIP ACK is used only for final response of INVITE
msg, but LinkSys PAP2 used it for Register response.

 

Are there any SIP RFCs to allow it?

 

Here is the sip trace:

 

[04/28/07 05:34:14.775975](sipServer00|3697826736)Rcv Stack Msg:

REGISTER sip:sip01.mynetfone.com.au SIP/2.0^M

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 124.189.51.79:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-8310ea79^M

Max-Forwards: 70^M

Contact: 09123994 <sip:09123994 at 124.189.51.79:5060>;expires=240^M

To: 09123994 <sip:09123994 at sip01.mynetfone.com.au>^M

From: 09123994
<sip:09123994 at sip01.mynetfone.com.au>;tag=2d656c4829c17b7ao0^M

Call-ID: b3bb7dca-a99dbfba at 124.189.51.79^M

CSeq: 62263 REGISTER^M

Allow: ACK, BYE, CANCEL, INFO, INVITE, NOTIFY, OPTIONS, REFER^M

Supported: x-sipura^M

User-Agent: Linksys/PAP2-3.1.9(LSc)^M

Content-Length: 0^M

 

[04/28/07 05:34:14.776328](sipServer00|4050291632)CallObj 266 Id
b3bb7dca-a99dbf

ba at 124.189.51.79 snd SIP STATUS 401 Msg

SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized^M

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 124.189.51.79:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-8310ea79^M

To: "09123994"<sip:09123994 at sip01.mynetfone.com.au>^M

From: <sip:09123994 at sip01.mynetfone.com.au>;tag=2d656c4829c17b7ao0^M

Call-ID: b3bb7dca-a99dbfba at 124.189.51.79^M

CSeq: 62263 REGISTER^M

User-Agent: EN2.5.23^M

WWW-Authenticate: Digest
nonce="626791f8_00266",realm="my.com",algorithm=MD5^M

Content-Length: 0^M

 

[04/28/07 05:32:14.799145](sipServer00|3697826736)Rcv Stack Msg:

ACK sip:09123994 at sip01.mynetfone.com.au SIP/2.0^M

Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 124.189.51.79:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-49c0bda0^M

To: "09123994" <sip:09123994 at sip01.mynetfone.com.au>^M

From: <sip:09123994 at sip01.mynetfone.com.au>;tag=2d656c4829c17b7ao0^M

Call-ID: b3bb7dca-a99dbfba at 124.189.51.79^M

CSeq: 62261 ACK^M

Content-Length: 0^M

^M

 

Regards,

 

Frank Y

 

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel at list.resiprocate.org
https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel

 

  

________________________________

Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48245/*http:/autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html;_
ylc=X3oDMTE1YW1jcXJ2BF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDbmV3LWNhcnM-
>  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20070427/32565167/attachment.htm>