[reSIProcate] Register challenged with 407, why not 401?
Steven Coule
Steven.Coule at envox.com
Mon Oct 30 17:25:13 CST 2006
We noticed at SIPit that a number of UACs did not cope with having their
REGISTER challenged with 407 Proxy-authenticate, but instead expected
401 Unauthorised.
Dum/ServerAuthmanager.cxx seems to have 407 hard-coded ...
Does anyone have any strong feelings as to why this is the case? Should
we really be sending a 401 when not acting as a proxy? (Our app is a
B2BUA).
Thanks,
Steve Coule
Envox UK Ltd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20061030/f2a26382/attachment.htm>
More information about the resiprocate-devel
mailing list