[reSIProcate] Many DUM -> one SipStack... Does it actually work??
Byron Campen
bcampen at estacado.net
Mon Aug 7 14:43:30 CDT 2006
The TuSelector in the resip stack uses TransactionUser::isForMe
(SipMessage& msg) to determine which TU to send the message to. The
TuSelector will hand the message to the first TU that returns true
when isForMe is called. You can influence how a given DUM answers
isForMe by registering MessageFilterRules with that particular
instance of DUM. (see repro/repro.cxx for an example of how this can
be done)
Best regards,
Byron Campen
> All,
>
> Although I was told several months ago that this should work, I am
> seeing problems with the same SipStack associated with 2 different
> UAs.
>
> The Registration of each UA seems to get routed correctly, i.e. the
> OnSuccess() for the Register for a specific UA is being delivered
> to the correct UA.
>
> However, when an INVITE is sent to a particular URI, it goes to the
> first UA that was associated with the SipStack.
>
> Any thoughts?? It seems the transaction layer is tied to IP:PORT
> somehow which could be a cause of this problem...
>
> Bill Kovar
> Avaya Inc.
> (732) 852-2609
> bkovar at avaya.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20060807/54f00939/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2369 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20060807/54f00939/attachment.bin>
More information about the resiprocate-devel
mailing list