[reSIProcate] New resip release

[Robert Sparks]

The anonymous download is 103M. A gzipped tarball of that weighs in  
at 17M.

The anonymous export is 35M (1/3, not 1/2). A gzipped tarball of that  
is 8M.

We could provide both as easily as we provide either one.

The big thing we're building consensus on here (and I think we're  
agreeing with each other)
is that act of making the distribution will involve running a simple  
command that's already implemented
rather than doing a lot of work to create and test a non-trivial make  
dist target.

RjS

ps - there's some scrubbing we can do to make those absolute numbers  
smaller too,
but on first inspection, we're talking about maybe a 5% reduction.

On Aug 4, 2006, at 12:18 PM, Byron Campen wrote:

> 	Would the tarball be twice as big? Is gzip smart enough to detect  
> that Foo.cxx and .svn/text-base/Foo.cxx are the same thing?
>
> Best regards,
> Byron Campen
>
>> Except that an svn checkout is twice the size of an svn export.
>>
>> Still want to do that?
>>
>> A
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Jason Fischl" <jason at counterpath.com>
>> Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 07:58:12
>> To:"Robert Sparks" <rjsparks at nostrum.com>
>> Cc:"Alan Hawrylyshen" <alan at polyphase.ca>,       resiprocate-devel  
>> <resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org>
>> Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] New resip release
>>
>> On 8/4/06, Robert Sparks <rjsparks at nostrum.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The next tarball won't bother - it will expose the same build system
>>> you get when you check out from head (along with the ./configure  
>>> adam
>>> contributed).
>>>
>>> I suspect we'll find the distribution will be a simple tarball of an
>>> anonymous checkout. (The person checking it out could run svn  
>>> update on the
>>> unrolled bits).
>>>
>>
>> This sounds perfect to me.
>> _______________________________________________
>> resiprocate-devel mailing list
>> resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
>> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>