[reSIProcate] New resip release

[Byron Campen]

	Would the tarball be twice as big? Is gzip smart enough to detect  
that Foo.cxx and .svn/text-base/Foo.cxx are the same thing?

Best regards,
Byron Campen

> Except that an svn checkout is twice the size of an svn export.
>
> Still want to do that?
>
> A
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Jason Fischl" <jason at counterpath.com>
> Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 07:58:12
> To:"Robert Sparks" <rjsparks at nostrum.com>
> Cc:"Alan Hawrylyshen" <alan at polyphase.ca>,       resiprocate-devel  
> <resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org>
> Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] New resip release
>
> On 8/4/06, Robert Sparks <rjsparks at nostrum.com> wrote:
>>
>> The next tarball won't bother - it will expose the same build system
>> you get when you check out from head (along with the ./configure adam
>> contributed).
>>
>> I suspect we'll find the distribution will be a simple tarball of an
>> anonymous checkout. (The person checking it out could run svn  
>> update on the
>> unrolled bits).
>>
>
> This sounds perfect to me.
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2369 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20060804/9379b276/attachment.bin>