[reSIProcate] resiprocate performance

[Klaus Darilion]

Sergio García Murillo wrote:
> If any one whishes to perform some intensive testing I recommend http://sipp.sourceforge.net/ very powerful and easy to use..

but buggy when generating high TCP load :-(

regards
klaus


> -----Original Message-----
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Nehal
> Sent: viernes, 28 de julio de 2006 13:23
> To: resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> Cc: 'Prasad Govindarajan'
> Subject: RE: [reSIProcate] resiprocate performance
> 
> Hi,
> 
> As per below mail, processing time is 268 usec per message. Am I Right? 
> 
> Could you please update us for CPU utilization while performing reciprocate performance?  Does it using both processors and the app is just running on one?
> 
> Also, was it one app bouncing the messages off of 127.0.0.1? If so is it really twice as many packets/messages?
> 
> Please update us if you have more information.
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> Nehal. 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Andy Agarwal
> Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 2:43 AM
> To: Vishal K. Singh; resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: RE: [reSIProcate] resiprocate performance
> 
> I got the head revision a couple of months ago and ran a test app which created two stacks and made calls between them. This app was able to handle 372 calls/sec on Windows Server 2003 (32 bit) on a dual processor 2.8GHz Xeon machine with 2GB of RAM.
> 
> Each call involved sending an INVITE from one instance of the stack to the other and then receiving a 180 and 200OK response and then sending an ACK followed by a BYE. So each call involved processing 10 SIP messages, hence you could say 3,720 SIP msgs per second.
> 
> Test program is attached...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Vishal K. Singh
> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 12:18 PM
> To: resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: [reSIProcate] resiprocate performance
> 
> Hello Everyone,
> 
> Has anyone done some performance measurements with resiprocate stack or repro proxy server ? It would be very helpful if you could share your performance results.
> 
> How much is raw message processing capacity of the stack and of the DUM layer?
> 
> I am trying decide whether to use the stack or DUM and performance trade-offs.
> 
> Also, Is there any plan to change the DUM layer soon ?
> 
> Thanks a lot for your time.
> 
> Regards,
> Vishal
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> 
> 
> 
> __________ NOD32 1.1677 (20060724) Information __________
> 
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely 
> for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. No confidentiality 
> or privilege is waived or lost by any wrong transmission. 
> If you have received this message in error, please immediately destroy it and kindly 
> notify the sender by reply email.
> You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any 
> part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Opinions, conclusions and 
> other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of 
> Ydilo Advanced Voice Solutions, S.A. shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel