[reSIProcate] resiprocate performance

[Sergio García Murillo]

If any one whishes to perform some intensive testing I recommend http://sipp.sourceforge.net/ very powerful and easy to use..

-----Original Message-----
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Nehal
Sent: viernes, 28 de julio de 2006 13:23
To: resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
Cc: 'Prasad Govindarajan'
Subject: RE: [reSIProcate] resiprocate performance

Hi,

As per below mail, processing time is 268 usec per message. Am I Right? 

Could you please update us for CPU utilization while performing reciprocate performance?  Does it using both processors and the app is just running on one?

Also, was it one app bouncing the messages off of 127.0.0.1? If so is it really twice as many packets/messages?

Please update us if you have more information.

Thanks in advance.

Thanks and Regards,
Nehal. 


-----Original Message-----
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Andy Agarwal
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 2:43 AM
To: Vishal K. Singh; resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: RE: [reSIProcate] resiprocate performance

I got the head revision a couple of months ago and ran a test app which created two stacks and made calls between them. This app was able to handle 372 calls/sec on Windows Server 2003 (32 bit) on a dual processor 2.8GHz Xeon machine with 2GB of RAM.

Each call involved sending an INVITE from one instance of the stack to the other and then receiving a 180 and 200OK response and then sending an ACK followed by a BYE. So each call involved processing 10 SIP messages, hence you could say 3,720 SIP msgs per second.

Test program is attached...




-----Original Message-----
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Vishal K. Singh
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 12:18 PM
To: resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [reSIProcate] resiprocate performance

Hello Everyone,

Has anyone done some performance measurements with resiprocate stack or repro proxy server ? It would be very helpful if you could share your performance results.

How much is raw message processing capacity of the stack and of the DUM layer?

I am trying decide whether to use the stack or DUM and performance trade-offs.

Also, Is there any plan to change the DUM layer soon ?

Thanks a lot for your time.

Regards,
Vishal
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel



__________ NOD32 1.1677 (20060724) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com


_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely 
for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. No confidentiality 
or privilege is waived or lost by any wrong transmission. 
If you have received this message in error, please immediately destroy it and kindly 
notify the sender by reply email.
You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any 
part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Opinions, conclusions and 
other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of 
Ydilo Advanced Voice Solutions, S.A. shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------