[reSIProcate] resiprocate performance

[Andy Agarwal]

I got the head revision a couple of months ago and ran a test app which
created two stacks and made calls between them. This app was able to
handle 372 calls/sec on Windows Server 2003 (32 bit) on a dual processor
2.8GHz Xeon machine with 2GB of RAM.

Each call involved sending an INVITE from one instance of the stack to
the other and then receiving a 180 and 200OK response and then sending
an ACK followed by a BYE. So each call involved processing 10 SIP
messages, hence you could say 3,720 SIP msgs per second.

Test program is attached...




-----Original Message-----
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
Vishal K. Singh
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 12:18 PM
To: resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [reSIProcate] resiprocate performance

Hello Everyone,

Has anyone done some performance measurements with resiprocate stack or
repro proxy server ? It would be very helpful if you could share your
performance results.

How much is raw message processing capacity of the stack and of the DUM
layer?

I am trying decide whether to use the stack or DUM and performance
trade-offs.

Also, Is there any plan to change the DUM layer soon ?

Thanks a lot for your time.

Regards,
Vishal
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: testSpeed.cpp
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 7512 bytes
Desc: testSpeed.cpp
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20060721/e117120f/attachment.obj>