[reSIProcate] sdp bug + why mCurrentLocalSdp, mProposedLocalSdp, mCurrentRemoteSdp and mProposedRemoteSdp
Scott Godin
slgodin at icescape.com
Mon Sep 26 22:55:19 CDT 2005
Good find. I committed a fix.
Thanks!
Proposed is an offer that hasn't been accepted yet. When answered - the
proposed sdp is copied to the Current sdp.
_____
From: resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:resiprocate-devel-bounces at list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Micky
Kaufmann
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2005 6:29 AM
To: resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [reSIProcate] sdp bug + why mCurrentLocalSdp,
mProposedLocalSdp,mCurrentRemoteSdp and mProposedRemoteSdp
Hi,
First of all I'm pretty sure there's a bug in
ServerInviteSession::sendProvisional :
.
.
.
if (mCurrentLocalSdp.get()) // early media
{
setSdp(m1xx, mProposedLocalSdp.get());
}
.
.
.
The variable checked in the if clause isn't the one sent to setSdp!!!
I think mCurrentLocalSdp is the correct variable to send to setSdp.
However, I don't completely understand the idea behind 'Current' and
'Proposed' in mCurrentLocalSdp, mProposedLocalSdp, mCurrentRemoteSdp and
mProposedRemoteSdp variables.
Is 'Proposed' always an offer and 'Current' always an answer? (In the case
of offer/answer)
Micky Kaufmann
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20050926/0e2cd759/attachment.htm>
More information about the resiprocate-devel
mailing list