[reSIProcate] Was - Where is "Resolver" implemented?

John Draper lists at webcrunchers.com
Thu Aug 4 18:32:20 CDT 2005


Alan Hawrylyshen wrote:

>
> On Aug 3, 2005, at 08:28, John Draper wrote:
>
>>
>> Why do they setup the build process to add the .o and .ol
>> files in with the .cxx and .hxx files?   Has anyone ever
>> thought of the ramifications of this?
>
>
> Most people build their source in a separate subdirectory, with a  
> tarball build:

That's what I thought.  but why when I build it,  does it put the .o and 
the .ol
files in the source?

>
> tar zxvf resiprocate-0.9.0-XXXX.tgz
> cd resiprocate
> mkdir compile
> cd compile
> ../configure (options)
> make
>
> In this case, all the object files will be in resiprocate/compile and  
> NOT in your source dir.

Not in MY system it doesn't....  I don't have a 'compile' directory, so 
why would the build
put all the .o and .ol files in my source directory.  Could it be a 
fault in the build file?  Like
perhaps it "forgot" to move the .o and .ol files out of there.

anyone care to comment?   I have judged that very few people on this 
list are using this
on the Mac....  perhaps this is a build bug worthy of attention to the 
"Build" team.

I'm using the Mac os-X 10.3

>
> The older build system uses architecture based names for temporary /  
> build files.

I'm using the 0.9.0 release.

John



More information about the resiprocate-devel mailing list