[reSIProcate] Was - Where is "Resolver" implemented?
John Draper
lists at webcrunchers.com
Thu Aug 4 18:32:20 CDT 2005
Alan Hawrylyshen wrote:
>
> On Aug 3, 2005, at 08:28, John Draper wrote:
>
>>
>> Why do they setup the build process to add the .o and .ol
>> files in with the .cxx and .hxx files? Has anyone ever
>> thought of the ramifications of this?
>
>
> Most people build their source in a separate subdirectory, with a
> tarball build:
That's what I thought. but why when I build it, does it put the .o and
the .ol
files in the source?
>
> tar zxvf resiprocate-0.9.0-XXXX.tgz
> cd resiprocate
> mkdir compile
> cd compile
> ../configure (options)
> make
>
> In this case, all the object files will be in resiprocate/compile and
> NOT in your source dir.
Not in MY system it doesn't.... I don't have a 'compile' directory, so
why would the build
put all the .o and .ol files in my source directory. Could it be a
fault in the build file? Like
perhaps it "forgot" to move the .o and .ol files out of there.
anyone care to comment? I have judged that very few people on this
list are using this
on the Mac.... perhaps this is a build bug worthy of attention to the
"Build" team.
I'm using the Mac os-X 10.3
>
> The older build system uses architecture based names for temporary /
> build files.
I'm using the 0.9.0 release.
John
More information about the resiprocate-devel
mailing list