[reSIProcate] New header implementaion

[david Butcher]

testParserCategoies.cxx is supposed to catch most header issues.

By any chance did you add your header enum after MAX_HEADER?

david


Quoting Viduraj sur <vidurajsur2 at yahoo.co.in>:

> Scott,
>
> Thanks for reply, I appriciate, you give time to write a mail.
>
> I made changes in HeaderHash.gperf, means added entry for New-Header 
> like others.
> As you written I have already done "make" because I am using linux OS.
> HeaderaHash.cxx is changned when I have done make and put line number 
> of each header.
> my added header entry is also comes like this
> #line 76 "HeaderHash.gperf"
> {"new-heade", Headers::New-Header},
>
> Now do I need to add or modify HeaderaHash.cxx some where else externally ?
>
> OR I need to do some modification in some other files also?
>
> I have run testParserCategories.cxx test case also, all hash is 
> proper working for new header also.
>
> You are saying I need to edit new generated HeaderaHash.cxx  file, 
> Could please tell me what exactly I need to add, if I am adding 
> New-Header of NameAddr type?
>
> Please let me know If I need to do extra thing?
>
> Your help would save my time, this will be great help from your side.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vid
>
>
> Scott Godin <slgodin at icescape.com> wrote:v\:* 
> {behavior:url(#default#VML);}o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}w\:* 
> {behavior:url(#default#VML);}.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
> Did you use gperf to build a new HeaderHash.cxx?  If you are using 
> *nix and make files, this should be automatic, but if you are using 
> windows then you will need download a win32 version of gperf and do 
> this step manually.  There are also some edits you need to do to the 
> generated HeaderaHash.cxx to make a case insensitive hash – check out 
> the make scripts, or compare your newly generated file to the 
> existing one to see what they are.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
> From: Viduraj sur [mailto:vidurajsur2 at yahoo.co.in]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 8:26 AM
> To: resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> Cc: resiprocate-devel-request at list.sipfoundry.org
> Subject: [reSIProcate] New header implementaion
>
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
>
>
> Did any body add any new header except "77" allready implemented 
> headers in HeaderTypes.hxx?
>
>
>
>
>
> Actually i am adding header with type "NameAddr" header in resiprocate stack
>
>
> I have been changed files according to the steps given by wiki page
>
>
> http://warsaw.sjc.purplecomm.com/wiki/index.php?title=Adding_a_new_header
>
>
>
>
>
> Code is compiling properly & i have run the test code of 
> testParserCategories.cxx, this is also working properly.
>
>
> and tried to encode & decode through test code also, its working fine.
>
>
>
>
>
> BUT... I am getting assertion error very early when I am trying to 
> send INVITE message from test tool with addred header.
>
>
>
>
>
> ERROR is :
>
>
> INFO | 20050719-031432.233 | RHEL4 | repro | REPRO:APP | 9243 | 
> 3075247024 | Proxy.cxx:57 | Proxy::thread start
> repro: os/Tuple.cxx:237: void resip::Tuple::setPort(int): Assertion 
> `0' failed.
> Aborted
>
>
> I Have figureout that, this stack is not allowing addition or 
> deletion of any headers, like this is fixed with 77 header only. I 
> have tried with 76 headers( comented 1 header in required 6 files), 
> still same error is comming.
>
>
> but I deleted 1 header & added my new header, then code is working 
> fine means total headers should have only 77, not more or less than 
> this number of headers
>
>
>
>
>
> do I need to change any thing except following files?
>
>
>
>
>
> HeaderHash.gperf
>
>
> Headers.cxx
>
>
> Headers.hxx
>
>
> HeaderTypes.hxx
>
>
> SipMessage.cxx
>
>
> SipMessage.hxx
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please guide me, That will be great help from your side.
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> vid
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
> Too much spam in your inbox? Yahoo! Mail gives you the best spam 
> protection for FREE!
> http://in.mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Too much spam in your inbox? Yahoo! Mail gives you the best spam 
> protection for FREE!
> http://in.mail.yahoo.com