[reSIProcate] Received Parameter In Via Header

[Scott Godin]

Thanks for the feedback Cullen!  I agree and have commit this change.

 

  _____  

From: Cullen Jennings [mailto:fluffy at cisco.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 11:08 PM
To: Scott Godin; resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate] Received Parameter In Via Header

 


I don't have any strong feelings one way or another but making the messages
smaller is not bad and I think this would make it more like what other
people do so I guess I am mildly in favor of this.


On 1/28/05 8:57 AM, "Scott Godin" <slgodin at icescape.com> wrote:

Hi Guys,
 
Quick question, during testing at Nortel, they noticed that we always insert
a received parameter into the Via header.  Technically this parameter is not
required if the sent-by portion of the Via contains an IP address and it is
the same as the one that message was received on.  Does anyone think it
would be worth while for me to make a check and only add the received
parameter if it differs from the sent-by parameter?
 
Technically it's not illegal to add it, like we do - but I guess it's
redundant.  Any thoughts?
 
 
Scott Godin

Research and Development

Computer Talk Technology

slgodin at icescape.com

905-882-5000 and 'Say my name' or x127




  _____  

_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20050214/8782bd00/attachment.htm>