[reSIProcate] Received Parameter In Via Header

[Cullen Jennings]

I don't have any strong feelings one way or another but making the messages
smaller is not bad and I think this would make it more like what other
people do so I guess I am mildly in favor of this.


On 1/28/05 8:57 AM, "Scott Godin" <slgodin at icescape.com> wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>  
> Quick question, during testing at Nortel, they noticed that we always insert a
> received parameter into the Via header.  Technically this parameter is not
> required if the sent-by portion of the Via contains an IP address and it is
> the same as the one that message was received on.  Does anyone think it would
> be worth while for me to make a check and only add the received parameter if
> it differs from the sent-by parameter?
>  
> Technically it's not illegal to add it, like we do - but I guess it's
> redundant.  Any thoughts?
>  
>  
> Scott Godin
> 
> Research and Development
> 
> Computer Talk Technology
> 
> slgodin at icescape.com
> 
> 905-882-5000 and 'Say my name' or x127
> 
>  
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel at list.sipfoundry.org
> https://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.resiprocate.org/pipermail/resiprocate-devel/attachments/20050210/6b30bdb6/attachment.htm>