Re: [reSIProcate-users] Resiprocate-webrtc gateway

[riko nir <nir.riko12345@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you Scott.

We are in the case, where the other end does not support ICE, but only the WebRTC clients. The gateway has to add the ICE information in the SDP. Also, the media needs to be received in the server, as we have the conference server, through which all the media should go and the server takes care of sending the media to all other members in the conference. Can I use Resiprocate in this scenario?
 

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Scott Godin <sgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello Nir,

repro is a good choice and there is information on configuring it here:  http://www.sipspectrum.com/blog/configuring-repro-for-webrtc

It should be noted that repro will handle your SIP traffic only, it will not do anything with the media plane.  It will not modify IP addresses in the SDP for NATing purposes - however this is not required if both ends support ICE.  repro supports DTLS for SIP traffic.

There is also additional info here:

http://rtcquickstart.org/guide/multi/sip-proxy-repro.html

Scott

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 2:30 AM, riko nir <nir.riko12345@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi, I am planning to implement a WEBRTC gateway for a SIP conference server like Freeswitch, so that SIP over websocket clients and webrtc clients will be able to participate in the conference with other SIPclients.The gateway needs to support NAT and DTLS.

I am planning use open-source for this, but I have little bit confused on choosing which one opensource gateway I can use and how can I implement, as I am very new to this. Do resiprocate would be appropriate for this implementation?

Thanks,

Nir.

_______________________________________________
resiprocate-users mailing list
resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List Archive: http://list.resiprocate.org/archive/resiprocate-users/