| < Previous by Date | Date Index | Next by Date > |
| < Previous in Thread | Thread Index |
HI,
Could you please confirm that the fix of Release 1.7.1 was restricted to a single file: rutil\Random.cxx ?
Thanks,
Julio.
From: Scott Godin [mailto:slgodin@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: quinta-feira, 8 de março de 2012 10:59
To: jcabezas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: <resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate-users] reSIProcate 1.7 with random number generator fixed
I've created a 1.7.1 tag and modified the links in the webpage to point to it. 1.7.1 contains the fix you need. I haven't created a new tarball for it yet though. Sorry for the confusion.
Scott
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:20 PM, <slgodin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My apologies - I forgot the link was to a tag and not the 1.7 branch. I believe the fix was made in the branch. I'll look at updating the website with the correct link tomorrow.
Scott
Sent from my iPhone
On 2012-03-07, at 6:54 PM, "Julio Cesar Esteves Cabezas" <jcabezas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi Scott,
I am confused.
The main page of site tells the zipped release of reSIProcate 1.7 is from May-17-2011
But Scott warned that such zip has a serious bug as related in the page http://www.resiprocate.org/ReSIProcate_1.7_Release.
And that page advises to checkout fixed code from the link http://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/resiprocate/tags/resiprocate-1.7
On inserting that URL in the Repo-browser of my Windows TortoiseSVN i can see the latest date of such code base is also May-17-2011 !!
I can´t believe the fix was delivered the same day of the buggy release !
What is wrong here ?
To help clear things: what is the Revision Number of the reSIProcate code WITH the RNG fix applied ?
Thanks,
Julio.
_______________________________________________
resiprocate-users mailing list
resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List Archive: http://list.resiprocate.org/archive/resiprocate-users/