< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index Next in Thread >

Re: [reSIProcate-users] Stack dropping response


This INVITE request is formed using the old SIP RFC2543 (ie. no branch
parameter in Via header), your other UA's are likely using RFC3261.  I
suspect that somewhere down the line, DUM is calling getTransactionId
on the response that it's forming, and this is causing the error.  It
would be useful to see a full INFO level resip trace of issue.

Scott

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Andrew Wood <ajwood@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Why is a 180 response to the following INVITE being dropped with this error.
>  The creator of the Contact field is a Cisco ATA but it isn't generating a
> branch tag which I suspect is something to do with it?
> It seems resiprocate doesnt like responses to an invite generated by the
> ATA, it handles responses to invites created by other user agents OK.
>
> INFO | 20090107-162450.068 |  | RESIP | 3081394384 | SipMessage.cxx:433 |
> Trying to compute a transaction id on a 2543 response. Drop the response
>
>
>
>
> INVITE sip:203@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.254.3:5060
> Max-Forwards: 70
> Contact: <sip:203@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060>
> To: <sip:203@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060;user=phone>
> From: <sip:202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;user=phone>;tag=3992865483
> Call-ID: 1875955767@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> CSeq: 1 INVITE
> Content-Type: application/sdp
> Content-Length: 248
>
> v=0
> o=202 30023 30023 IN IP4 192.168.254.3
> s=ATA186 Call
> c=IN IP4 192.168.254.3
> t=0 0
> m=audio 16384 RTP/AVP 8 0 4 101
> a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000/1
> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000/1
> a=rtpmap:4 G723/8000/1
> a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
> a=fmtp:101 0-15
>
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-users mailing list
> resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> List Archive: http://list.resiprocate.org/archive/resiprocate-users/
>