Re: [reSIProcate-users] Resiprocate TLS help

[Byron Campen <bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

	I've looked at the code, and I'm pretty sure this was fixed in  
version 1.2. If you can get your sipp instance to put an rport in its  
Via, this should let things function ok with 1.1.

Best regards,
Byron Campen

> I'm running version 1.1. Please find the full log attached.
> Thanks!
>
> > -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> > Från: Byron Campen [mailto:bcampen@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Skickat: den 23 november 2007 06:32
> > Till: Krister Jarl
> > Kopia: Boris Rozinov; resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Ämne: Re: [reSIProcate-users] Resiprocate TLS help
> >
> >         This is very strange behavior. What revision are you running?
> > Also,
> > full logs would help us debug.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Byron Campen
> >
> >
> > > Ok, I see. Then what am I doing wrong?
> > > I'm just using one of the makeResponse functions to create the
> > > response and then passing it to the stack send function.
> > >
> > > /KJ
> > >
> > > > -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> > > > Från: Boris Rozinov [mailto:borisrozinov@xxxxxxxx]
> > > > Skickat: den 22 november 2007 16:02
> > > > Till: Krister Jarl; resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Ämne: Re: [reSIProcate-users] Resiprocate TLS help
> > > >
> > > > It is not OK to try to open new conection for sending
> > > > response; UA should reuse the same connection that the
> > > > request was received on. Only if this connection is
> > > > down, UA should open new connection based on value
> > > > retrieved in Via header.
> > > >
> > > > --- Krister Jarl <kj@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm using the resiprocate stack to implement TLS
> > > > > support for our
> > > > > application, but I've encountered some problems.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I've set up the security object and passed it to the
> > > > > stack. Receiving an
> > > > > INVITE works perfectly but when I'm trying to send a
> > > > > 100 Trying response
> > > > > I get the following:
> > > > >
> > > > > connection id 4 exists, but does not match the
> > > > > destination. ("Cid" and
> > > > > "Tuple" does not match. From what I can see the only
> > > > > thing that differs
> > > > > is the remote port.)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > So resiprocate then tries to set up a new connection
> > > > > (I guess this is
> > > > > OK?). However, during the handshake there's a
> > > > > certificate mismatch.
> > > > >
> > > > > "Certificate name mismatch: trying to connect to <>
> > > > > remote cert
> > > > > domain(s) are <X.X.X.X>"
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The remote cert domain is correct but why is target
> > > > > domain empty?
> > > > > Checking the log file I can see that the target
> > > > > domain is 'unspecified'.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm betting that I've overlooked something simple.
> > > > > All help is much
> > > > > appreciated!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, when sending requests, can I think of the
> > > > > TlsTransport as an
> > > > > "encrypted pipe" just throwing my requests into it
> > > > > or do I have to take
> > > > > some special actions before sending?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > >
> > > > > KJ
> > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > resiprocate-users mailing list
> > > > > resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > List Archive:
> > > > http://resiprocate.org/archive/resiprocate-users/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >      Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr!
> > > >
> > > > http://www.flickr.com/gift/
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > resiprocate-users mailing list
> > > resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > List Archive: http://resiprocate.org/archive/resiprocate-users/
>
> <log.txt>

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature