< Previous by Date Date Index Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread Thread Index  

Re: [reSIProcate-users] Register multiple To: within the same UA


Yes I was looking the handles with getid(). But this morning I did a fresh resiprocate update and this problem is now solved. Last time I did an update I took only partial stuff... it was probably a bad idea.
 
Thanks for your help Scott.
 
Francis


Subject: RE: [reSIProcate-users] Register multiple To: within the same UA
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:28:53 -0500
From: slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To: francis_moreau@xxxxxxxxxxx; slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx; resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I do not see any problems in the log file – both registrations are unique and appear to have separate handles allocated.  What revision are you using?  There was some changes applied to Handle.hxx on October 4, 2007.  How are you checking if the handles are different?  getId()?

 

Scott

 

From: Francis Moreau [mailto:francis_moreau@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 2:39 PM
To: Scott Godin; resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [reSIProcate-users] Register multiple To: within the same UA

 

I attached the resip log.
 
Thanks,
Francis


From: francis_moreau@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx; resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:36:02 -0500
Subject: Re: [reSIProcate-users] Register multiple To: within the same UA

In attachment are both REGISTER messages. I will post the resip log at DEBUG soon.


Subject: RE: [reSIProcate-users] Register multiple To: within the same UA
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:23:17 -0500
From: slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To: francis_moreau@xxxxxxxxxxx; resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Is the branch parameter different in the Via header of both REGISTER messages?

 

Can you post a resip log at DEBUG level?

 

Scott

 

From: Francis Moreau [mailto:francis_moreau@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 1:15 PM
To: Scott Godin; resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [reSIProcate-users] Register multiple To: within the same UA

 

makeRegistration with a separate UserProfile is exactly what I am doing:
 
-----
resip::SharedPtr<resip::UserProfile> newUserProfile(new resip::UserProfile());
 
// Set the outbound proxy to the new user profile
newUserProfile->setOutboundProxy(url.uri());

resip::SharedPtr<resip::SipMessage> sipMessage = dum.makeRegistration(
  to,
  newUserProfile,
  new ResipAppDialogSet(*this, dum, strUuid.c_str()));


// Modify the Request-Uri header
resip::RequestLine rLine = sipMessage->header(resip::H_RequestLine::sGet());
rLine.uri() = url.uri();
sipMessage->header(resip::H_RequestLine::sGet()) = rLine;

 
// Remove the existing Contact header
sipMessage->header(resip::H_Contacts::sGet()).clear();
  
// Add the Contact header received in parameter
for (size_t i = 0; i < vContact.size(); ++i) {
  sipMessage->header(resip::H_Contacts::sGet()).push_back(vContact[i]);
}

 
dum.send(sipMessage);
-----

When a trace the code I can see that the object DialogSet::mClientRegistration are different for both registrations. But the ClientRegistrationHandle passed to ClientRegistrationHandler::onSuccess(...) is always the same.
 
I validated that the registration messages were good by looking at them with wire shark.
 
Francis


Subject: RE: [reSIProcate-users] Register multiple To: within the same UA
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:08:55 -0500
From: slgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To: francis_moreau@xxxxxxxxxxx; resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

You are probably not creating the registrations properly.

 

You should be calling makeRegistration for each user and passing in a separate UserProfile object for each call.

 

Scott

 

From: resiprocate-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:resiprocate-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Francis Moreau
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 11:55 AM
To: resiprocate-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [reSIProcate-users] Register multiple To: within the same UA

 

Hello all,
 
I am using resiprocate with dum to build a UA acting as a parking UA. This means I need to register different To: header with Contact: header pointing on my parking UA:
 
REGISTER sip:registrar:5060
Contact: <sip:user111@parking_ua:5077>
To: <sip:user111@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060>
 
REGISTER sip:registrar:5060
Contact: <sip:user222@parking_ua:5077>
To: <sip:user222@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:5060>
 
The problem I have now it's when I received callback from dum on ClientRegistrationHandler::onSuccess(ClientRegistrationHandle h, SipMessage msg) the ClientRegistrationHandle in parameter is the same for both REGISTER messages. This is problematic since I don't know on which binding function as ClientRegistrationHandle.addBinding() is applied to.
 
Is there something I could configure that will create a different ClientRegistrationHandle for each different registration done?
 
Thanks,
Francis
 


R U Ready for Windows Live Messenger Beta 8.5? Try it today!

 


Express yourself with free Messenger emoticons. Get them today!

 


Send a smile, make someone laugh, have some fun! Start now!

 


Have fun while connecting on Messenger! Click here to learn more.



Send a smile, make someone laugh, have some fun! Start now!