< Previous by Date | Date Index | Next by Date > |
< Previous in Thread | Thread Index | Next in Thread > |
Enforcing the RFC specified order makes our parsing more
efficient. However, if this really is a common bug (I’ve never come across it
before) – then we could consider making a special case for it. Scott From: Robert Sparks
[mailto:rjsparks@xxxxxxxxxxx] Scott - Why do we care? Unless I'm missing something, this is a
place where we can apply Postel's Maxim to benefit. If we write an encoder, it should always put the t line in
the right place. But when we're parsing - what would break if we allowed t to
float through the message? RjS On Aug 25, 2007, at 9:23 AM, Scott Godin wrote:
Resiprocate
is parsing correctly. Note the highlighted lines below – t is always
before a in a session description. Scott From:
resiprocate-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:resiprocate-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Aziz Mzili Hi
All, In
one of our products using resiprocate, we send an sdp similar to the following: v=0 Resiprocate
in SdpContents.cxx ( SdpContents::Session::parse(ParseBuffer&
pb) ) parses 't', 'z','k', and 'a', then 'm' . But rfc 4566 says the following
in section 5 : Some lines in each description are REQUIRED and some
are OPTIONAL,
You notice that 'a' is before 't'. and
in our case the media section is not parsed. any
comments ??? thank
you Aziz _______________________________________________ resiprocate-users mailing list List Archive: http://list.resiprocate.org/archive/resiprocate-users/ |