Re: [reSIProcate] Suggestion regarding c-ares and e-poll interface

[Scott Godin <sgodin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

This looks like some good stuff!  Thanks for contributing.  I'm a bit pegged at the moment, but I would like to review this in more detail when I get some cycles.  

How confident are you that the Windows FdPoll stuff was not broken?  

Thanks again!

Scott

On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Misha Uliutin <mishaulyutin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello,

I’ve created a Pull request[1] in which I moved c-ares wrapper (AresDNS) to e-poll based interface.

Also I’ve deleted a inefficient hack code from FdPoll.cxx, which was added for supporting c-ares wrapper based on FdSetIOObserver.

Can someone review it and get to the point where it can be merged?

 

[1] = https://github.com/resiprocate/resiprocate/pull/51

BR,

Misha U.

_______________________________________________
resiprocate-devel mailing list
resiprocate-devel@resiprocate.org
https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel