Re: [reSIProcate] the Git discussion (v2.0)
Just resending this to see if people have any feedback or motivation for
or against this idea.
On 30/05/14 20:56, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
>
> I just had a brief chat with Scott and the Git subject came up again.
>
> We are just wondering:
>
> a) is there anybody against the idea of moving to Git?
>
> b) how do people feel about Git hosting options?
>
> There are two hosting options that come to mind:
>
> 1. Github
> - mirror of the repository automatically synced to the existing project
> server every 15 minutes for backup
> - people can submit patches as pull requests
> - people can fork with 1 click
>
> 2. Dedicated solution on the current server (Philip, can you let us know
> what you could provide?). Some of the features that are probably needed:
> - a front end like cgit or gitweb
> - some access control setup for Git over ssh
(two common solutions are gitosis and gitolite,
although git over ssh alone may be sufficient)
> - a tool like Gerrit could be used to provide a web-based collaboration
> workflow
(this is entirely optional, but gives us more
ability to do interactive code review if not using github
web-based code review)
>
>
> If we go with github, then we can still have a read-only cgit on the
> resiprocate.org server too.
> _______________________________________________
> resiprocate-devel mailing list
> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>