< Previous by Date	Date Index	Next by Date >
< Previous in Thread	Thread Index	Next in Thread >

Re: [reSIProcate] asio version? separate reTurn source tarball?

From: Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:46:57 +0100

On 13/02/14 16:42, Scott Godin wrote:

Just tried 1.10.1 - it only needed a few fixes to compile. Checked into SVN. The changes are backwards compatible with 1.4.8.

Great, Markus (who packages asio on Debian) also suggested it just involved changing ErrorType

Will you have time to give it any functional testing before we take those fixes into the 1.9 branch?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [reSIProcate] asio version? separate reTurn source tarball?
  - From: Scott Godin

References:
- [reSIProcate] asio version? separate reTurn source tarball?
  - From: Daniel Pocock
- Re: [reSIProcate] asio version? separate reTurn source tarball?
  - From: Scott Godin
- Re: [reSIProcate] asio version? separate reTurn source tarball?
  - From: Daniel Pocock
- Re: [reSIProcate] asio version? separate reTurn source tarball?
  - From: Scott Godin

Prev by Date: Re: [reSIProcate] asio version? separate reTurn source tarball?
Next by Date: Re: [reSIProcate] asio version? separate reTurn source tarball?
Previous by thread: Re: [reSIProcate] asio version? separate reTurn source tarball?
Next by thread: Re: [reSIProcate] asio version? separate reTurn source tarball?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread