Re: [reSIProcate] asio version? separate reTurn source tarball?
On 11/02/14 23:53, Scott Godin wrote:
> Any idea if reTurn builds on asio 1.10 already?
>
> Seems like the easiest way to go is to ensure that it will.
>
It currently fails
The 1.10.1 package was on Debian when I uploaded the reSIProcate
release, Debian now has 1.4.8 again while we investigate
The two main things we need to check:
a) does it involve a big effort to change things or just some renamed
methods?
b) can we concurrently support the old version? This is important
because 1.4.8 is in EPEL6 (for RHEL6 / CentOS6 users)
> Scott
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> reTurn currently builds against asio 1.4.x
>>
>> Debian 7, Fedora and EPEL6 carry 1.4.x
>>
>> Debian 8 (jessie) may carry asio 1.10.x
>>
>> Fedora 21 has not made any decision
>>
>> Keeping dependencies like this in sync can be a pain
>>
>> Is there any motivation to use 1.10.x in the next reSIProcate release?
>>
>> Should we possibly start releasing reTurn as a separate source tarball
>> so that this dependency issue doesn't impact the process of releasing
>> the core reSIProcate/repro packages?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> resiprocate-devel mailing list
>> resiprocate-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://list.resiprocate.org/mailman/listinfo/resiprocate-devel
>>
>