[reSIProcate] future of TransportType?

[Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

http://svn.resiprocate.org/viewsvn/resiprocate/branches/b-webrtc/rutil/TransportType.hxx?r1=9964&r2=9965&diff_format=l

- notice that reSIProcate has a single list of transport types.  This
may not be ideal for WebSockets (and possibly other use cases), as WSS
is not valid in every context (e.g. it can be in a Via header, but only
ws can appear in a URI transport parameter)
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sipcore-sip-websocket-07#section-5.2

Do we need to have different definitions of TransportType, e.g.
Via::TransportType and Uri::TransportType?  I realise this would impact
many other things in the code, but maybe a discussion that is worth
having (or maybe worth giving feedback on the draft).