Re: [reSIProcate] Move to autotools ;)
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Daniel Pocock <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> If you like, you can build a release tarball (it is very easy, just run
> build/release-tarball.sh) and then unpack the tarball somewhere and try
> to use it
Great, you've used the automake dist target.
> So far we've verified that the autotools build is almost completely
> automatic on Debian, Ubuntu, Solaris (using SunPro), and MacOS - if you
> can verify other platforms, that is also good.
This works out good, Centos/Fedora is my area of concentration.
>> On a related note, I just committed build integration for resiprocate
>> to the sipXecs. I took svn rev 9367 before any autotools work. I
>> forked the spec file, but I imagine this will be in flux as the work
>> to autotools continues so I'll hang on to my patches there.
>>
>> https://github.com/dhubler/sipxecs/commit/3df7aac3397f525ab5ec8028d18a95777c7915f8
>
> Is this something you were going to push back into the resiprocate repo,
> or you just maintain your own fork of the spec file externally?
contribute back definitely. I should have written "hang on to my
patches for now"
> Filenames and some locations also change, e.g. the libs now have names
> like librutil-1.8.so rather than just librutil.so
libtool (assuming you're using that) should generate both, but ok.